Papers with human translation
GECO-MT: The Ghent Eye-tracking Corpus of Machine Translation (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite improvements in machine translation output, remarkable differences can be observed when comparing machine translations (MT) and human translations. |
| Approach: | They describe a corpus of eye movement data collected during natural reading of a human translation and a machine translation of . they use this corpus to investigate the effect of machine translation on the reading process and the effects of various error types on reading. |
| Outcome: | The proposed corpus will be used in future research to investigate the effect of machine translation on the reading process and the effects of various error types on reading. |
On Systematic Style Differences between Unsupervised and Supervised MT and an Application for High-Resource Machine Translation (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern unsupervised machine translation systems reach reasonable translation quality under clean and controlled data conditions. |
| Approach: | They compare unsupervised and supervised machine translation systems of similar quality . they combine the benefits of both methods into a single system . |
| Outcome: | The proposed system improves adequacy and fluency as measured by human evaluators. |
Assessing Human-Parity in Machine Translation on the Segment Level (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent machine translation shared tasks have shown top-performing systems to tie or outperform human translation. |
| Approach: | They examine the outputs of top-performing systems in a recent machine translation shared task . they find that some systems outperform human translation on average . |
| Outcome: | a new method identifies segments for which human and machine perform poorly . the results show that top-performing systems outperform human translation on average . |
MTCue: Learning Zero-Shot Control of Extra-Textual Attributes by Leveraging Unstructured Context in Neural Machine Translation (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research has focused on providing individual, well-defined types of context in translation, such as the surrounding text or discrete external variables like the speaker’s gender. |
| Approach: | They introduce a novel neural machine translation framework that interprets all context as text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms a baseline that matched the parameters and significantly outperformed it in English translation. |
Detecting Non-literal Translations by Fine-tuning Cross-lingual Pre-trained Language Models (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Non-literal translations are difficult to produce even for human translators, especially for foreign language learners, and machine translations have not yet been developed to simulate human translations. |
| Approach: | They propose to fine-tune generic sentence representations produced by a pre-trained cross-lingual language model to detect non-literal translations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can predict human translations and distinguish literal and non-literal translations at phrase level with a moderate positive correlation. |
On “Human Parity” and “Super Human Performance” in Machine Translation Evaluation (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this paper, we reassess claims of human parity and super human performance in machine translation. |
| Approach: | They reassess claims of human parity and super human performance in machine translation . they argue that human translation involves much more than what is embedded in automatic systems . |
| Outcome: | The proposed results show that human translation involves much more than what is embedded in automatic systems. |
LiTransProQA: An LLM-based Literary Translation Evaluation Metric with Professional Question Answering (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics for literature prioritize mechanical accuracy over artistic expression . this bias could result in an irreversible decline in translation quality and cultural authenticity . |
| Approach: | They propose a novel, reference-free, LLM-based question-answering framework for literary translation evaluation. |
| Outcome: | a novel, reference-free, LLM-based question-answering framework is developed for literary translation evaluation. |
CEMT:Controllable Element-Oriented Machine Translation via Structured Linguistic Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models suffer from paraphrasing errors, omissions, or hallucinations when input contains translation-specific elements that require strict preservation or controlled transformation. |
| Approach: | They propose a Controllable Element-Oriented Machine Translation framework that decomposes the translation process into a linguistically grounded analysis, strategy formulation, and final generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves on the WMT23/24 Chinese–English benchmarks while significantly reducing element-level constraint violations. |